facebook
linkedin
email
pinterest
  • Home
  • Website Mission
    • G. Dale Meyer – On the Unified View
    • G. Dale Meyer on Shopenhauer
    • Biography of G. Dale Meyer
    • Martin Luther Reflection
  • Sages
    • Allan Watts
      • Allan Watts Books
    • C. G. Jung
      • C. G. Jung Books
    • Eckhardt Tolle
      • Eckhardt Tolle Books
    • Frithjof Schuon
      • Frithjof Schuon Books
    • G. I. Gurdjieff
      • Gurdjieff_books
    • Huston Smith
      • Huston Smith Books
    • Joseph Campbell
      • Joseph Campbell Books
    • Ken Wilber
      • Ken Wilber Books
    • Krishnamurti
      • Krishnamurti Books
    • Krishnamurti
      • Krishnamurti Books
    • Paul Tillich
      • Paul Tillich Books
    • Ram Dass
      • Ram Dass Books
    • Mircea Eliade
    • Rabbi Zalman Schachter
      • Zalman M. Schachter-Shalomi Books
      • Remembering Rabbi Zalman Schachter-Shalomi
    • Reinhold Niebuhr
      • Reinhold Niebuhr Books
    • Rene Guenon
      • Rene Guenon Books
    • Teilhard de Chardin
      • Teilhard de Chardin Books
    • Thich Nhat Hanh
      • Thich Nhat Hanh Books
  • Compassion
    • Karen Armstrong
      • Karen Armstrong Books
    • Read & Sign The Charter for Compassion
    • Compassionate Cities
    • Dalai Lama
    • Golden Mean
  • World Religions
    • Bahai Faith
      • Bahai – Source Texts
    • Buddhism
      • Notes on Basic Buddhist Thought
      • Buddhism: E-books & Source Texts
    • Christianity
      • Christianity: Scriptures and E-books
    • Confucianism
      • Confucianism – Sacred Texts
    • Hinduism
      • Hinduism: Source Texts & E-books
    • Islam
      • Islam: Source Texts
    • Jainism
      • Jainism: Source Texts
    • Judaism
      • Judaism – Source Texts & eBooks
    • Pantheism
    • Shinto
      • Shinto – Source Texts
    • Sikhism
      • Sikhism – Sacred Texts
    • Taoism
      • Taoism – Source Texts & eBooks
    • Zoastrianism – Source Texts & eBooks
      • Zoroastrianism
  • Science & Religion
    • A Science and Religion Debate
    • Religion and Science: Irreconcilable?
    • Science, Sacred, Spiritual: What Is In A Word?
    • Complex Systems
    • Sacred Geometry
      • Fibonacci Sequence
      • Synergetics
    • The Re-Enchantment of Humanity – Stuart Kaufman
    • Lothar Schafer PH.D.
  • Practices
    • Meditation
      • Meditation Books

Science, Sacred, Spiritual: What Is In A Word?

Science, Sacred, Spiritual: What Is In A Word?

by Adam Frank

From: National Public Radio’s 13.7 Cosmos and Culture Blog 

SacredOrSpiritual

“Spiritual But Not Religious” is the way describe themselves these days. It’s a term that drives a lot of others crazy. For those who happily describe themselves as religious, “Spiritual But Not Religious” can imply a dilution of faith and a rejection of the creed and doctrine which, for them, is an essential aspect of spiritual life.Yet for people who happily describe themselves as atheist, “Spiritual But Not Religious” is a dodge — an attempt to get “the warm cozy feeling” of religious life without making the intellectual commitment to what they see as the central question: Does God exist?Where should science lie on this spectrum of debate? Can someone still call themselves “spiritual” and hold fast to the principles of science?Recently I participated in a podcast and I took on this question. I argued there (as I will here) that science is, indeed, an organic focus of the human sense of “spirit.” The key, of course, is that we must allow ourselves to adapt language to the living needs of those generations living now. But for me spirituality may not be the right word on which to focus this effort. The question is not one of science and spirituality but science and the sacred.

First, lets deal with the oft-stated criticism that any attempt to adapt or enlarge language for new purposes represents nothing more than “invention.” If we are looking to avoid connotations of the supernatural — which I am — why try and use “sacred” to mean anything other than what people think it means: God. The answer is simple, even if there are a number of ways to reach it.

Every generation has the right, indeed the responsibility, to take the language it was given, listen to its resonances and use them for the purposes at hand. To do anything less would be to kill the language through atrophy. In a sense this is what scholar means when she talks about “creative misreading” of earlier texts in a religious tradition.

But there is another reason for turning to the “sacred” rather than “spiritual” in a scientific age. It’s an old, old word whose roots are in Roman temple architecture. “Sacer” could mean “set apart” and was the interior of a pagan temple where visitors needed to be attentive to the needs of the gods. Outside you could do anything you wanted, including selling Grateful Dead T-shirts. Inside you were expected to pay attention to a different quality of experience.

The concept of attention in this context is key. Attention and the sacred go together which is why 20th century scholars of religion like Rudolph Otto and emphasized the sacred in their attempts to describe its vital role in the 50,000-year history of human culture.

For Eliade the sacred was an experience, it was the eruption of a certain kind of attention, a certain kind of position with respect to the world. The sacred often appears to us in the middle of our “profane” everyday activities. We are taking a walk in the park thinking about what we have to do tomorrow and — bam! —suddenly we see the breathtaking tangle of vines curling around a tree or the deep stillness of the robin sitting attentive on its branch.

Eliade’s point was that much of human history has been the attempt to cultivate that experience, draw it out and bring it closer. Its efficacy is why the best of our churches, temples and mosques harbor a profound quiet and stillness that even an atheist like me can feel. The construction of those buildings reflects not only awful power politics and all it entails. These temples also contain our ancient and ongoing attempt to evoke the sacred in the world. If they didn’t the population institutional religions so often sought to control would never have shown up.

Eliade even had a word for the experience: hierophany. This was his expression for the eruption of the sacred into our lives. Just as an epiphany can relate to ideas, a hierophany relates to experience — the experience of the sacred.

It’s at this point that we can see the connection, and the usefulness, of the sacred to a world saturated with the fruits of science. For all its usefulness in developing technology, science is elementally a path to hierophany. The insight and all-embracing vision of life (and cosmos) so apparent though science is also gateway to the experience of the sacred.

It always has been.

From the Pythagorean Brotherhood’s contemplation of mathematical beauty to Kepler’s elation on finding the true geometric form of planetary motion, science has always provided us with experiences of the world as sacred. It’s an experience that is not reserved for scientists.

The fruits of science manifest in culture in many ways: from Hubble Space Telescope images to the narratives of life’s origin. These fruits are often presented in a way that is meant to explicitly invoke that “oceanic feeling” as Freud would call it. From NOVA programs to IMAX movies, we are given our cultures’ pathway to experience the sacred through science. If we cannot immediately recognize that fact it is only because we have been steeped in a polarization between fundamentalist religion and science for so long that we have been trained not to see it.

The reflexive rejection of words like sacred by many who reject institutional religion is misguided. The great and real danger we face is the rejection of science by religious literalism. To ignore the essential aspect of being human in these experiences — called sacred by some and spiritual by others — is to miss the ancient resonance in these words. They are, in their essence, atoms of a poetry to which we have always responded.

In this remarkable historical moment we face existential challenges that demand an informed deployment of science. In response, the question before us becomes how to marshal the resonance in words like “sacred.” We will, without doubt, need its poetics as we build the next version of culture our evolution now demands.


Adam Frank (born 1 August 1962 in New York) is a United States physicist, astronomer and writer. His research focuses on computational astrophysics with an emphasis on star formation and late stages of stellar evolution. His popular writing has focused on issues of science it its cultural context including issues of science and religion and the role of technology in the human experience of time. He is a co-founder of National Public Radio’s 13.7 Cosmos and Culture Blog

Categories

  • Books
  • Compassion
  • E-books
  • G. Dale Meyer
  • Intersection of Science & Spirituality
  • Life After Death
  • Multimedia Content
  • Mysticism
  • Religious Scholars
  • Religious Skepticism
  • Sages
  • Science & Religion Debate
  • Source Scriptures
  • Spiritual Activism
  • Spiritual Practices
  • The Heroes Journey
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • World Religions

Register

Register For This Site

By registering with this blog you are also agreeing to receive email notifications for new posts but you can unsubscribe at anytime.

A password will be e-mailed to you.

  • Log In

Contact Us

  1. Name *
    * Please enter your name
  2. Email *
    * Please enter a valid email address
  3. Message *
    * Please enter message

Site by: http://LauerCreative.com

  • Pin It